Jenna
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Wait... what's so funny?
Postman makes the distinction between those not knowing why they were laughing or why they had stopped thinking to those who are laughing instead of thinking. He illustrates to us that "we are in a race between education and disaster." The media of our time is ruining the desire to learn. Which sums up his whole book, Postman isn't against all television or electronics, he is against the negative affects it has on the community. Through the cahnges and improvements, people have lost track of the original purpose. Not just merely using entertainment as a substitute for more important information.
Sunday, February 6, 2011
My lips are sealed
Friday's activity of using only "charades" or illustrations to communicate with others was quite difficult. It's extremely hard to express how you feel about something or to draw something out which takes forever compared to just saying it really fast. During Spanish class we were told that our assignment was to complete the back side of a worksheet. Miss Schaidt told us that we had the worksheet, and Kendra, Russell, and I were the only ones who realized that we didn't have the worksheet, but we could say anything to get her attention. So we had to wait for someone else in the class to realize and tell her for us. In the end we didn't get homework. And we made it through the day :D
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Just text me.
In both Dr. Postman's interview and in his book Amusing Ourselves to Death, the point is made that we basically talk more to machines (answering machines, voice-mail, of through text) more than people these days. As humans, we become too obsessed with the new ways of communicating, whether it's texting, facebook, myspace, email, etc. We soon may become just as comfortable as talking with "inanimate objects." People need to learn to take a break from this increase and what we consider improvements in society because it is pulling us away from face-to-face human interaction.
Image is another main topic present in both the book and the interview. Postman uses the fact that cloning is currently becoming more and more advanced. To the point that animals such as a monkey, a sheep, and a frog have all been cloned and humans are the next step. This will allow humans the security that if something goes wrong with their body, they can just replace it with the one from the clone. Also Postman writes in his novel about people only being concerned with their looks. That even newscasters are more concerned about their make-up than their script. America desires those good looking people to look up to, that most people with jobs at a news station must work behind the camera because their looks don't stand up to another person's. The American society is becoming too selfish and concerned with the little things in life such as looks and not as concerned with the relationships, jobs, and events in life.
Image is another main topic present in both the book and the interview. Postman uses the fact that cloning is currently becoming more and more advanced. To the point that animals such as a monkey, a sheep, and a frog have all been cloned and humans are the next step. This will allow humans the security that if something goes wrong with their body, they can just replace it with the one from the clone. Also Postman writes in his novel about people only being concerned with their looks. That even newscasters are more concerned about their make-up than their script. America desires those good looking people to look up to, that most people with jobs at a news station must work behind the camera because their looks don't stand up to another person's. The American society is becoming too selfish and concerned with the little things in life such as looks and not as concerned with the relationships, jobs, and events in life.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
CIVILITY IN POLITICS
1- In Linda Chavez' column, she begins with the phrase, "Civility in public discourse is important.." This phrase illustrates that decency or politeness is key when speaking to the public. Not that certain sayings should be avoided because of the opinions of some, but that foul language should not be used and can clearly be eluded.
2- Since "bellicose" means to be inclined to fight or aggressively hostile, this thoroughly describes many of the political debates. It clearly represents the now slang terms used to describe the occurrences in a debate. These terms and sayings are a major part of politics and all know that they should not be taken so literally. As she uses the example, "When we say a candidate "took his best shot," we don't mean he aimed a gun at his opponent." This really helps prove her point that since that phrase is not taken literally, why should it be removed?
3- Chavez is clearly trying to persuade her readers that it is not necessary to remove certain sayings. Just to be cautious about what is said in front of the public. Seeing as many words in our vocabulary have been commonly known as unacceptable in public, the non-literal phrases shouldn't be removed because the society has grown and changed the meanings of words to unacceptable slang meanings. Like in the example "We've already virtually eliminated certain words from our public vocabulary -- or revised the meaning of others to conform to political correctness. Former Washington Mayor Anthony Williams forced the resignation a decade ago of a white staffer who used the word "niggardly" in a private staff meeting, even though the word means miserly or parsimonious; its etymology, according to Webster's Third New International Dictionary, traces from the Old Norse to Middle English and has nothing to do with race or color." The society has changed the meanings of words so that the original meaning would be acceptable to be used, but no one considers that meaning, the slang version becomes the new application of the word that comes to mind first.
4- Yes I agree with Chavez, that with a careful choice of words, it’s simple to be sarcastic, derisive and not “bland” without using foul language in front of the public.
2- Since "bellicose" means to be inclined to fight or aggressively hostile, this thoroughly describes many of the political debates. It clearly represents the now slang terms used to describe the occurrences in a debate. These terms and sayings are a major part of politics and all know that they should not be taken so literally. As she uses the example, "When we say a candidate "took his best shot," we don't mean he aimed a gun at his opponent." This really helps prove her point that since that phrase is not taken literally, why should it be removed?
3- Chavez is clearly trying to persuade her readers that it is not necessary to remove certain sayings. Just to be cautious about what is said in front of the public. Seeing as many words in our vocabulary have been commonly known as unacceptable in public, the non-literal phrases shouldn't be removed because the society has grown and changed the meanings of words to unacceptable slang meanings. Like in the example "We've already virtually eliminated certain words from our public vocabulary -- or revised the meaning of others to conform to political correctness. Former Washington Mayor Anthony Williams forced the resignation a decade ago of a white staffer who used the word "niggardly" in a private staff meeting, even though the word means miserly or parsimonious; its etymology, according to Webster's Third New International Dictionary, traces from the Old Norse to Middle English and has nothing to do with race or color." The society has changed the meanings of words so that the original meaning would be acceptable to be used, but no one considers that meaning, the slang version becomes the new application of the word that comes to mind first.
4- Yes I agree with Chavez, that with a careful choice of words, it’s simple to be sarcastic, derisive and not “bland” without using foul language in front of the public.
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
It's All About The Three R's: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle
Waldemar R. Semrau's point of the article is revealed in
"Reuse provides maximum function for given material and energy input."
In this article Semrau compares the saying "Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle" with his career choices during his lifetime. Semrau's technique for writing leaves out the facts about himself that would turn this into more a biography than that of an article. The facts about his life are necessary to get his point across but great details about them are not. He illustrates himself as a young child aspiring to be a surgeon. This strategy of using childhood dreams allows many readers to relate to him and the article. It grasps the reader’s attention into the article. But like many, he abandons that dream and does what he needs to survive in the real world. He becomes an engineer; after many years and close to retirement he decides to make some changes in his life. He knows that his death is approaching so he decides to reuse his talents in another way. Just like recycling can turn a pop-can into something else. He knows that by doing so he can also give back to the earth and those living here. He may be able to help someone in his life. So he decides to try and fulfill his childhood fantasies to be a surgeon.
Thursday, December 9, 2010
"Savior of the nations, come"
In "Savior of the Nations, Come," Luther illustrates the birth of the Lord our Savior. And how he was born of the virgin Mary. He was not only just Mary's son, he was also they Lord's. Luther also tells us that when returning to his Heavenly home, Jesus overcomes death and hell. At the end of the hymn, Luther glorifies God the Father, Jesus the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This hymn is so strong because of the diction Luther chooses. By using "Though by all the world disowned, Still to be in heaven enthroned." Luther strengthens the hymn. It makes us think about how everyone disowned Christ, even the closest of his friends. Using other words such as left, ignored would not have portrayed the same feeling of being abandoned. Yet God the Father was always with him and waited for him to return to heaven. Another strong point in the hymn is verse five. "Thou, the Father's only Son, Hast o'er sin the victory won. Boundless shall Thy kingdom be; When shall we its glories see?" It is important because it informs us on the relationship between God and Jesus and about Jesus' victory over our sin. This gives us the joy that we will not suffer eternal death because of our sin.
Friday, December 3, 2010
Sermon Diagnostic
1) 23 mentions of Christ.
2) Some of the verbs: slain, died, rose, makes holy, took sin, is lamb, makes pure, slows, makes blessings, rose.
3) In Edward's sermon, the main topic is about eternal judgment and the wraths of hell. He describes hell as a burning furnace to scare many of the believers to stay in the faith. His sermon barely mentions Christ. Yet Borghardt's sermon is the total opposite from Edward’s. Borghardt uses Christ very much and when he uses Christ, he uses him as the subject of all the verbs. His sermon tells us about God’s grace and how great he truly is. This allows people to see God’s mercy and choose to come to the faith, instead of scaring them into it.
2) Some of the verbs: slain, died, rose, makes holy, took sin, is lamb, makes pure, slows, makes blessings, rose.
3) In Edward's sermon, the main topic is about eternal judgment and the wraths of hell. He describes hell as a burning furnace to scare many of the believers to stay in the faith. His sermon barely mentions Christ. Yet Borghardt's sermon is the total opposite from Edward’s. Borghardt uses Christ very much and when he uses Christ, he uses him as the subject of all the verbs. His sermon tells us about God’s grace and how great he truly is. This allows people to see God’s mercy and choose to come to the faith, instead of scaring them into it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)